Competing priorities
Several initiatives require budget, people and executive attention at the same time.
Place different project choices side by side and show what the comparison is based on. This makes a difficult decision easier to discuss and explain.
A building block within iSyNAPS
Goals, roles, working methods and validated knowledge provide the context for this building block. During onboarding, we agree what is needed. That profile can then grow with further applications, within the permissions agreed for your organisation.
Explore the ecosystem ↗The challenge
Projects compete for the same budgets, people and leadership attention. If criteria and assumptions are hidden, prioritisation quickly feels subjective.
Several initiatives require budget, people and executive attention at the same time.
A change in one project can affect other parts of the portfolio.
Criteria, weighting and assumptions are not always visible in the final judgement.
Benefits to test
In a pilot, test whether choices become easier to compare and whether criteria, assumptions and uncertainty remain visible during decision-making.
Make clear what a comparison is based on.
See the possible effects of different choices.
Retain context for discussion and accountability.
Who it is for
For comparison, scenarios and preparing portfolio decisions.
For conversations about priority, deliverability and connections.
For insight into assumptions, risks and potential consequences.
For connecting goals, indicators and portfolio information.
How it works
PRISMA places project mixes and priorities side by side using agreed criteria. Portfolio managers and decision-makers review the outcomes and uncertainty.
Define goals, values, risks and conditions.
Bring projects, dependencies and available information together.
Compare the possible effects of different priorities or conditions.
Discuss assumptions, uncertainty and public interests before a decision is made.
Capabilities
Compare projects and scenarios by goals, value, risk, dependencies and capacity. Criteria and assumptions remain visible for review.
See goals, progress, risks and issues in context.
Show how projects contribute to organisational goals under chosen criteria.
Explore relationships and potential effects between projects.
Compare options using explicit inputs and assumptions.
Turn analysis into draft overviews for discussion and review.
Allow responsible professionals to verify criteria and assumptions.
Frequently asked questions
No. PRISMA supports analysis and scenario exploration. Authorised people weigh public interests and make the decision.
No. They show what follows from selected data and assumptions. Uncertainty and missing information must be part of the review.
PRISMA compares possible portfolio choices. FOCUS turns selected project information into a short summary with decision questions.
That is the intended connection. The technical options and data definitions are explored for each environment.
PRISMA is being developed and tested as a pilot. Current capabilities and availability are confirmed for each pilot.