Fragmented overview
Project and programme information uses different sources and definitions.
P3RIMA shows which projects need attention and where people or funding are short. Everyone discusses planning and priority using the same information.
A building block within iSyNAPS
Goals, roles, working methods and validated knowledge provide the context for this building block. During onboarding, we agree what is needed. That profile can then grow with further applications, within the permissions agreed for your organisation.
Explore the ecosystem ↗The challenge
When progress, costs, risks and capacity are kept separately, bottlenecks and dependencies often become visible too late.
Project and programme information uses different sources and definitions.
Priorities are not always compared with available roles and people.
Risks and dependencies may only come together during reporting or decision-making.
Benefits to test
In a pilot, test whether one shared view exposes bottlenecks earlier and makes conversations about priority, planning and capacity more concrete.
Use shared definitions for projects, programmes and resources.
Bring risks, dependencies and capacity together.
Support conversations about starting, pausing or replanning.
Who it is for
For portfolio overview, prioritisation and regular reporting cycles.
For connections between progress, dependencies and capacity.
For choices about deliverability, priority and allocation of people and resources.
For consistent definitions and more reusable management information.
How it works
Agree the definitions, bring the selected projects together and use the same view for planning, prioritisation and action.
Determine which initiatives, projects and programmes are in scope.
Agree definitions for status, risk, budget, capacity and goals.
Reveal bottlenecks, dependencies and capacity needs.
Use the shared view during regular governance and decision-making moments.
Capabilities
Track projects, programmes, capacity, budgets and risks using the same definitions. We agree the available components in advance.
Track scope, milestones, risks, issues, actions and progress.
Connect projects contributing to the same challenge or goal.
Compare initiatives by value, urgency, risk and interdependencies.
Make required and available roles, teams and capacity discussable.
Use consistent definitions and reusable reporting data.
Support summarisation and signalling, with professionals reviewing findings.
Frequently asked questions
Not necessarily. P3RIMA is intended as a connected management layer. Each pilot explores which information can be imported, exported or integrated.
No. It can organise information and support signals. Authorised managers and elected officials weigh interests and make decisions.
P3RIMA shows what is running and where capacity is under pressure. PRISMA compares possible priorities and project combinations.
That depends on the required level of detail. Start with roles, teams and available capacity; only use personal data where necessary and appropriately governed.
P3RIMA is in pilot and further development. Available components are confirmed for each pilot.